Clearance calendar
One row per season week, one column per class, with the price action in the cell. Good for coordinating ticketing labor, signage, and floor space across several categories at once.
Every column is either an input you decide or a formula that follows from it. Keep depth measured against the original ticket rather than the previous price — successive percentages compound and quietly make the plan deeper than intended.
| Column | Type | What goes in it |
|---|---|---|
| Period | Text | Full price, First markdown, Second markdown, Clearance |
| Start date | Date | First day the price is live |
| Weeks | Number | Weeks until the next break or the season exit date |
| Depth % | Number | Reduction off the original ticket, not off the previous price |
| Ticket price | Formula | = original × (1 − depth) |
| Weekly sell-through % | Number | Share of remaining units sold each week at this price |
| Units sold | Formula | = units at start × (1 − (1 − rate)^weeks) |
| Revenue | Formula | = units sold × ticket price |
| Markdown $ | Formula | = units sold × (original − ticket price) |
| Units remaining | Formula | = units at start − units sold |
A 14-week autumn season with three breaks. Ending-units target: 50. Result: 33 units left, $28,625 recovered, 45.9% maintained margin against a 63.3% initial margin — 17.4 points of erosion.
| Period | Start | Weeks | Depth | Ticket | Weekly ST | Units sold | Revenue | Units left |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full price | Sep 1 | 4 | 0% | $49.00 | 12% | 182 | $8,918 | 676 |
| First markdown | Sep 29 | 4 | 20% | $39.20 | 10% | 247 | $9,682 | 429 |
| Second markdown | Oct 27 | 3 | 40% | $29.40 | 22% | 231 | $6,791 | 198 |
| Clearance | Nov 17 | 3 | 60% | $19.60 | 45% | 165 | $3,234 | 33 |
Figures produced by the Planned Markdown model from the sell-through rates shown. Substitute your own weekly rates — they are the assumption that moves every other column.
Also useful
One row per season week, one column per class, with the price action in the cell. Good for coordinating ticketing labor, signage, and floor space across several categories at once.
One column per candidate cadence and one row per output: maintained margin, ending units, cash recovered, markdown dollars. This is the sheet the markdown meeting actually argues over, and it is what the calculator's scenario table produces directly.
A sheet documents one plan well. It compares plans badly: each what-if means duplicating the tab, re-entering assumptions, and hoping the formulas came along. It also hides the demand guess — a single sell-through number per period reads as certainty when it is an estimate with a wide band around it.
That is the gap the interactive planner fills: the same columns, plus a sell-through assumption you can flex up and down to see the slow, planned, and fast outcomes side by side.
Same structure, plus scenario comparison, sensitivity band, and CSV export in the layout above.
Every formula in the template, written out with worked numbers.
How to size the final row so the season actually exits clean.
The process and calendar the template is meant to record.
Answers
Enter the season once, compare cadences side by side, and export the finished schedule to CSV in the column layout above.