Sell-through rate and markdown strategy

Markdown timing is a velocity problem before it is a pricing problem. Weekly sell-through tells you how many weeks of supply you are carrying; the season exit date tells you how many weeks you have. When the first number exceeds the second, price has to change — and how much it has to change depends on the lift each depth has historically produced.

Weeks of supply is the trigger, not the sell-through percentage

Weekly sell-through = units sold this week ÷ units on hand at the start of the week. Weeks of supply = remaining units ÷ current weekly units. That second figure is the one to compare against the weeks left in the season, because it already accounts for how much inventory you are still holding.

The table below runs the same 676 remaining units at four different weekly rates against a 10-week runway. Notice that the decision flips on velocity alone — nothing about cost, ticket price, or competitor pricing has changed.

Weeks of supply against a 10-week runway (676 units remaining)
Weekly sell-throughUnits on handUnits / weekWeeks of supplyWeeks leftRead
12%676818.3 wks10 wksOn pace — hold
8%6765412.5 wks10 wksBehind — pull the break forward
5%6763420.0 wks10 wksBadly behind — break now and deeper
16%6761086.3 wks10 wksAhead — delay or soften the break

Building the assumption

How to set a sell-through rate for each price period

The planner asks for a weekly rate per price period. These are the sources worth using, in order of reliability.

Last season, same class

Best source

Pull weekly units at each discount depth from the comparable season and convert to a percentage of stock on hand at that time. Imperfect history beats a confident guess.

The current full-price rate

Your anchor

You already know this week's rate. Use it for the full-price period, then apply the lift ratios you observed historically at each depth rather than inventing new absolute numbers.

A wide sensitivity spread

When history is thin

New class, new channel, or no comparable season: widen the spread so the slow case is genuinely pessimistic, and judge the plan on that case rather than the midpoint.

Sell-through versus margin: the trade you are actually making

Buying velocity with price is not free and it is not marginal — the reduction applies to every unit sold at that ticket, including the ones that would have sold anyway. That is why a modest early break often outperforms a deep late one: it runs a smaller reduction across more weeks of remaining demand, instead of a huge reduction across a broken assortment in the final fortnight.

The way to settle the argument is to model both cadences with honest per-period rates and compare maintained margin at the same ending-stock outcome. If two plans both hit the target, the cheaper one wins; if only one hits it in the slow case, that is the plan.

Keep planning

Answers

Sell-through and markdown questions

Turn your weekly rates into a season outcome

Enter a sell-through assumption per price period and see ending stock, cash recovered, and maintained margin as a range rather than a single number.

Open the markdown planner