Last season, same class
Best source
Pull weekly units at each discount depth from the comparable season and convert to a percentage of stock on hand at that time. Imperfect history beats a confident guess.
Weekly sell-through = units sold this week ÷ units on hand at the start of the week. Weeks of supply = remaining units ÷ current weekly units. That second figure is the one to compare against the weeks left in the season, because it already accounts for how much inventory you are still holding.
The table below runs the same 676 remaining units at four different weekly rates against a 10-week runway. Notice that the decision flips on velocity alone — nothing about cost, ticket price, or competitor pricing has changed.
| Weekly sell-through | Units on hand | Units / week | Weeks of supply | Weeks left | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12% | 676 | 81 | 8.3 wks | 10 wks | On pace — hold |
| 8% | 676 | 54 | 12.5 wks | 10 wks | Behind — pull the break forward |
| 5% | 676 | 34 | 20.0 wks | 10 wks | Badly behind — break now and deeper |
| 16% | 676 | 108 | 6.3 wks | 10 wks | Ahead — delay or soften the break |
Building the assumption
The planner asks for a weekly rate per price period. These are the sources worth using, in order of reliability.
Best source
Pull weekly units at each discount depth from the comparable season and convert to a percentage of stock on hand at that time. Imperfect history beats a confident guess.
Your anchor
You already know this week's rate. Use it for the full-price period, then apply the lift ratios you observed historically at each depth rather than inventing new absolute numbers.
When history is thin
New class, new channel, or no comparable season: widen the spread so the slow case is genuinely pessimistic, and judge the plan on that case rather than the midpoint.
Buying velocity with price is not free and it is not marginal — the reduction applies to every unit sold at that ticket, including the ones that would have sold anyway. That is why a modest early break often outperforms a deep late one: it runs a smaller reduction across more weeks of remaining demand, instead of a huge reduction across a broken assortment in the final fortnight.
The way to settle the argument is to model both cadences with honest per-period rates and compare maintained margin at the same ending-stock outcome. If two plans both hit the target, the cheaper one wins; if only one hits it in the slow case, that is the plan.
Every price period carries its own editable sell-through rate, with a slow / planned / fast band.
Turning these velocity signals into a decision date.
Cadence shapes and how depth and timing interact across a full season.
Price the margin cost of the velocity you are buying.
Answers
Enter a sell-through assumption per price period and see ending stock, cash recovered, and maintained margin as a range rather than a single number.