High-low promotional
Highest exposure
Regular promotions leave gaps between events where unsold stock ages; a planned cadence keeps that stock moving instead of piling up before the next event.
Cost-plus / keystone pricing applies a fixed markup to cost — simple, but ignores demand and competition. Competitive pricing sets price relative to rivals, requiring ongoing price monitoring. High-low promotional pricing sets a higher regular price and drives volume through frequent temporary promotions. EDLP sets one steady low price and skips the promotional cycle entirely.
Bundling and multi-unit pricing raise transaction size by pricing groups of items together. Psychological pricing (charm pricing like $19.99) is a low-cost add-on tactic layered onto any of the above. Premium pricing charges above market to signal quality or exclusivity. Penetration pricing launches low to win share, then raises price later. And planned markdown / clearance pricing manages the decline of a price on a schedule tied to sell-through, rather than reacting to it late.
High-low margin is stronger at this promo mix.
Share of units on promo where blended AUR equals the EDLP price.
Blended AUR weights full-price and promo-price units by the promo share entered. The break-even promo share shows how much volume would need to run on promotion for high-low revenue per unit to match the steady EDLP price.
Where markdown planning matters most
Any strategy that starts at a higher price than it expects to fully sell through creates leftover stock — and leftover stock is a markdown decision waiting to happen.
Highest exposure
Regular promotions leave gaps between events where unsold stock ages; a planned cadence keeps that stock moving instead of piling up before the next event.
Exposure managed by design
The whole point of this strategy is to schedule the decline — depth and timing set against a sell-through target rather than decided reactively at season end.
Lowest exposure
No promotional cycle means little structural leftover stock, but margin has no promotional cushion if costs rise or volume misses plan.
| Strategy | Margin potential | Operational load | Markdown exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost-plus / keystone | Consistent, predictable | Low | Low |
| Competitive pricing | Depends on rivals | Medium — needs price monitoring | Medium |
| High-low promotional | Diluted by promo mix | High — active promo calendar | High |
| EDLP | Steady, thinner | Medium — needs cost discipline | Low |
| Bundling | Blended, often protected | Medium — bundle logistics | Low-medium |
| Multi-unit pricing | Blended, volume-driven | Low-medium | Medium |
| Psychological / charm | Marginal lift | Low | None (add-on tactic) |
| Premium pricing | High per unit | Medium — brand/service investment | Low |
| Penetration pricing | Low upfront | Medium — needs a raise-price plan | Medium |
| Planned markdown / clearance | Managed decline by design | High — schedule and triggers | High (managed) |
Set the price periods and sell-through targets a promotional or clearance strategy actually needs, and see maintained margin before the season starts.
Free, no sign-up, with CSV export and a shareable link. Pro ($29/mo) saves named season plans, imports inventory CSVs, and prints a decision memo.
Why a scheduled markdown behaves differently from an ad hoc price cut.
How the two terms relate and where they get confused.
Set the starting price a cost-plus or keystone strategy relies on.
Cadence shapes for whichever pricing strategy generates leftover stock.
Answers